Difference between revisions of "PNC 03/03/2024"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
| Line 26: | Line 24: | ||
''Suggested by James O'Keefe of the Massachusetts Pirate Party'' | ''Suggested by James O'Keefe of the Massachusetts Pirate Party'' | ||
| − | [ https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-house-speaker-again-pulls-hotly-debated-domestic-surveillance-bill-2024-02-14/ Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) is set to expire in April]. It allows warrantless surveillance. | + | [https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-house-speaker-again-pulls-hotly-debated-domestic-surveillance-bill-2024-02-14/ Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) is set to expire in April]. It allows warrantless surveillance. |
There are efforts to reform it with support from both Republicans and Democrats. Members of both parties support reauthorization and the [https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/28/us/politics/nsa-fbi-surveillance-program.html Biden administration has asked for a one year extension]. | There are efforts to reform it with support from both Republicans and Democrats. Members of both parties support reauthorization and the [https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/28/us/politics/nsa-fbi-surveillance-program.html Biden administration has asked for a one year extension]. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:05, 3 March 2024
Agenda
Reports
IT
Outreach
Platform
Officers
Discussion
Old Business
New Business
FISA Section 702
Suggested by James O'Keefe of the Massachusetts Pirate Party
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) is set to expire in April. It allows warrantless surveillance.
There are efforts to reform it with support from both Republicans and Democrats. Members of both parties support reauthorization and the Biden administration has asked for a one year extension.
Should we take a position and what should it be? Let it expire or embrace reform?